Dear Adaptation Mavens,
My hypothetical goal is to develop landscape-scale adaptation strategies that will maximize the ability of wildlife and their habitats to persist in upland/inland systems under climate change. I can imagine numerous adaptation strategies that can be employed at the project & site level in both inland and coastal sites. I can even tentatively identify a couple of landscape-scale adaptation strategies that may be appropriate for coastal systems, despite the inherent uniqueness of every site. However, I am having a harder time identifying landscape-scale strategies for inland/upland systems.
What can one do beyond identifying biologically diverse "hotspots" and conserving large tracts of land that are conducive to movement and include the greatest number of these biologically/geologically rich sites? Are adaptation strategies most applicable at the project or site level?
Sincerely, No Finger Guns
Dear No Finger,
Here is our hypothetical answer to your hypothetical question. Just as the effects of climate change are experienced differently at different scales, so too must adaptation be approached differently at different scales. Some solutions can only be enacted at the federal or even multinational scale; others can only be effectively enacted at the site or project level. There is useful work to be done at both ends of, as well as all along, the spatial spectrum. If you’re trying to figure out the right scale for your own adaptation action, we suggest that you either focus on strategies that are best implemented at the scale at which you currently work, or find yourself a new position where you can work at the scale necessary to enact the strategies you think are most important. Read more »