Incorporating Climate Change into Florida’s State Wildlife Action Plan
This image has been released into the public domain because it contains materials that originally came from the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). No endorsement by licensor implied.
Although Florida habitats and species face significant threats related to sea level rise, Florida’s first state wildlife action plan did not comprehensively consider climate change impacts. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) worked with partners to assess species vulnerability using new models and approaches during the first revision of the state wildlife action plan.
Florida has almost 1,930 km (1,200 mi) of coast, almost 3,700 km (2,300 mi) of tidal coastline, and a growing coastal population. Sea level rise and other climate change impacts, including increased temperatures and ocean acidification, threaten fish, wildlife, and natural ecosystems in Florida. Sea level rise will cause land loss, physical changes to coastal systems such as beaches and estuaries, and associated changes to habitat function and ecosystem services including degraded water quality and saltwater inundation of freshwater reserves.
To update the action plan, FWC staff worked with Defenders of Wildlife and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to explore two complementary approaches to assess species vulnerability. The first approach was a vulnerability index that generates relative vulnerability ranks across species and helps elucidate underlying factors contributing to vulnerability. The Climate Change Vulnerability Index, which was developed by NatureServ, was used to determine relative vulnerability of 25 species to climate change. Information for this approach was gathered from climate models and data available through The Nature Conservancy’s Climate Wizard and input from species experts. In the second approach, spatially explicit vulnerability analyses were used to simulate a range of likely responses to sea level rise, public policy options, and financial conditions. These approaches differed in the degree to which they incorporated both human and species-level responses, as well as in the type and scale of the outputs that were produced.
Outcomes and Conclusions
Outputs from both approaches were brought into a workshop-based process involving managers and biologists and used to identify potential adaptation strategies for focal species. The FWC intends to build on the groundwork laid by this pilot study by exploring ways to apply vulnerability assessments more broadly and to determine how these results could be used to inform agency decisions such as species management, land acquisition, policy, and research and monitoring efforts. The project took 1–3 years to complete.
This case study is part of the 2015 National Park Service report, Coastal Adaptation Strategies: Case Studies. These case studies initially were developed by park managers as part of a NPS-led coastal adaptation training in May 2012. The case studies follow the format created for EcoAdapt’s Climate Adaptation Knowledge Exchange (CAKE) database, including a list of adaptation strategies. All case studies were updated and modified in September 2013 and March 2015 in response to a growing number of requests from coastal parks and other coastal management agencies looking for examples of climate change adaptation strategies for natural and cultural resources and assets along their ocean, lacustrine, and riverine coasts.
Project File (s)
Parsons, D. (2015). Incorporating Climate Change into Florida’s State Wildlife Action Plan [Case study on a project of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission]. Excerpted from Schupp, C.A., R.L. Beavers, and M.A. Caffrey [eds.]. 2015. Coastal Adaptation Strategies: Case Studies. NPS 999/129700. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. Retrieved from CAKE: www.cakex.org/case-studies/incorporating-climate-change-floridas-state-w...(Last updated November 2015)